Cases 41 - 50 of 50,556
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dike v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vickie Diane Dike
Defendant:
David Knight, Trey English, Heather McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters #588025 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00496
Petitioner:
Kwauntay Waters #588025
Defendant:
H. Washington, John Davids, Unknown Vonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. State of New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hoffman, David T. Hernandez, Randy Lopez and others
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALEY v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
ALEX HAYDN HALEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL., INC., KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez Jr v. Trejo Jr et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Armando Cortez Jr
Defendant:
Glen Trejo Jr, Officer Ceja, Granger Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
