Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21815
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv03286
Plaintiff:
DAVID A MCCOY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCoy v. Stiefel et al
as 2:2019cv00199
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Co., Travelers Insurance Company and David C Stiefel
Plaintiff:
David G McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. Stiefel et al
as 1:2019cv00319
Defendant:
David C. Stiefel, GEICO General Insurance Co. and Travelers Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
David G. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy et al v. Patterson et al
as 2:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
David M. McCoy and Kathy McCoy
Defendant:
Bayles Farm Trucking, LLC and Brian L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dillard v. Burns et al
as 1:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Dewey Eugene Dillard, III
Defendant:
Lemeul R Burns and David R McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey v. Mid Level Medical Providers et al
as 4:2015cv02870
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Chad Aubrey
Defendant:
Mid Level Medical Providers, Karen Faust, Patrick Muldonney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy et al v. Manning Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
David A. McCoy and Regena L. McCoy
Defendant:
Fritz Kingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02409
Plaintiff:
David Warren McCoy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27973
Plaintiff:
David Warren McCoy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
