Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fuller v. Madson et al
as 0:2023cv03467
Plaintiff:
Jonathan-David Fuller
Defendant:
Deanna-Fay Madson, Jessie Behrhorst and State of Minnesota Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Battin
as 0:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Jonothan-David Fuller
Defendant:
Jim Battin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kennedy v. Sonoma County Superior Court et al
as 4:2015cv01642
Plaintiff:
Rheanna D. Kennedy
Defendant:
Sonoma County Superior Court, Sonoma County Human Services, Sonoma County Public Defenders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuller, et al v. Davis, et al
as 14-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FULLER, Grandparent and RUTH M. FULLER, Grandparent
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN W. DAVIS, Honorable Judge, in his official and individual capacity, MARY NOONAN, Honorable Judge, in her official and individual capacity, JAY JENSEN, Dr. of ACAFS, (a/k/a the Family Academy) and others
Fuller et al v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David Fuller and Ruth M. Fuller
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis , Mary Noonan , Jay Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman et al v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
as 2:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Chris Crisler, Steve Daniel and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Mack v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Mental Health et al
as 3:2007cv30195
Plaintiff:
Harold Richard Mack
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Mental Health, Deval Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
