Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00015
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09833
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09116
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Muncy v. Muncy et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Defendant: Sgt. Marcus Johnson, John Does, Lt. Kenny Brandenburg and others
Plaintiff: Meghan A. Muncy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
David Matthews v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv07581
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fishbourne v. Murdaugh et al
as 3:2024cv04472
Defendant: State of S.C., 14th Circuit Solicitors Office, Geroge C James and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Fishbourne and Ricardo Fishburne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
USA v. Daniel Matthews
as 24-5587
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID MATTHEWS and DANIEL MATTHEWS
Matthews v. USA
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner: David Matthews
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?