Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Perry v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Levi Shandrew, Joseph Amies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Matthews et al v. Guest Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews, Lawrence Jackson, Jeffrey Johnson and others
Defendant:
Guest Services, Inc., Guest Services, Inc. Termination Pay Plan, Gerard Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Steven Woodson, Jr. v. Jodi Sheesley, et al
as 23-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, ANGEL GRESSEL and others
USA v. Perry
as 23-10976
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Roy David Perry
Perry v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Martin L. Cohen
Defendant:
Russell Richardson, David Perry, Geneva Cushman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perry v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv12894
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
