Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Booth v. Frazier et al
as 4:2018cv01739
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Booth
Defendant:
Brett Frazier, David Rogers, Robert Poythress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpas v. Rogers et al
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Jon David Rogers and Bernard Francis McEvoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dull v. Wright
as 1:2016cv00938
Petitioner:
David Roger Dull
Respondent:
Edward Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Bland, Et Al
as 7:2016cv00116
Defendant:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland, Raymond Keith Fivecoat, Alan B. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Dusty Lee Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Unknown
as 2:2016cv00908
Plaintiff:
David Roger Wilson
Defendant:
Warden, Bu Ikeg and Casipit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ditch v. Rogers et al
as 4:2015cv02094
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ditch
Defendant:
David Rogers, Community Education Centers, Inc., Raymond Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Mortensbak v. Nicholas Butler, et al
as 15-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Roger Mortensbak
Defendant - Appellee:
Nicholas Butler, Paul Wayne Smersrud, Sargent McManus and others
THOMPSON v. DOWNEY et al
as 2:2015cv00113
Defendant:
DOWNEY, KINTON and DAVID ROGERS
Plaintiff:
WESLEY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant:
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL et al
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, PENDER CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
