Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reilly v. St. Clair County et al
as 2:2022cv11952
Plaintiff:
Jamie Reilly
Defendant:
St. Clair County, St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County Commissioners and others
Rushing v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2021cv00929
Plaintiff:
David Rushing
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson, Jr. v. Mace-Liebson et al
as 1:2020cv01247
Defendant:
Richard Andruezzi, Douglas McClintock, David Rush and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Runion v. Donnellon et al
as 5:2019cv11812
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Runion
Defendant:
Colleen Spencer, Tiffany Francis, David Rushing and others
Reilly v. Spencer et al
as 2:2019cv11249
Defendant:
Derik Evenson, Thomas Buckley, David Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
James Reilly
Hajny v. Harpool et al
as 6:2016cv03505
Plaintiff:
James Hajny
Defendant:
Douglas Harpool, Brian C Wimes and David Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rush v. Smith et al
as 4:2013cv01873
Plaintiff:
David Rush
Defendant:
Nurse Smith, Nurse Spivey, Schaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey et al v. Magistrate Court et al
as 6:2008cv03005
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Rainey, Jaida Rainey, Jordin Rainey and others
Defendant:
Magistrate Court, Kim W. Dean, David Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fuqua v. Johnson et al
as 3:2007cv08047
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Sorel Johnson, K C Clark, C J Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
