Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17834
Plaintiff:
DEAN MICHAEL ROGERS JR. and DEAN ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Dean Rogers and Stephanie Rogers
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRANDEBURA et al v. CRAIG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv01724
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KELLEY, WAYNE P. BROOKS, TAJAH RUSSELL and others
Defendant:
DEAN ROGERS and CRAIG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rogers v. Bishop
as 1:2020cv00147
Petitioner:
Travis Dean Rogers
Respondent:
Ricky Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Barnes, et al
as 4:2018cv03818
Plaintiff:
Asia Williams
Defendant:
Dean Rogers, USA Truck, Inc. and David Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Panoam v. Rogers
as 3:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
James Panoam
Defendant:
Dean Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Barns et al
as 5:2014ct03002
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dean Rogers
Defendant:
M. Barns and Nurse Healther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Rogers v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-50252
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD DEAN ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ronald Rogers v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-51077
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD DEAN ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rogers v. Perry Dean Rogers And Partners, Architects, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11730
Plaintiff:
Alice Hyde Rogers
Defendant:
Perry Dean Rogers And Partners, Architects, Inc. and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
