Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
Doe v. Kane, et al.
as 1:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Boudreau, Mary Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Kane et al
as 2:2019at00271
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Boudreau, Mary Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiPierro v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2019cv10495
Defendant:
Hugh J. Hurwitz and Deborah G. Schult
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dipierro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
SHORTER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00108
Respondent:
TRANSGENDER CLINICAL CARE TEAM, DEBORAH G SCHULT, MARK S INCH and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SHORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2018cv03605
Defendant:
Dr. I. Negron, Hugh Hurwitz, Dr. R. Lepiane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gospodinov v. Hudson et al
as 3:2018cv50314
Plaintiff:
Emil Dimitrov Gospodinov
Defendant:
Teri Gregory, Capt. Paul Harvey, Michael Kruger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorter et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv22472
Defendant:
Transgender Clinical Care Team, Sero Director J. A. Keller, Medical Director Jeffrey Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Shorter
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
