Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 135
City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System et al v. Pegasystems Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11220
Plaintiff: City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Retirement Income Plan 1987 and others
Defendant: Pegasystems Inc., Alan Trefler and Kenneth Stillwell
Petitioner: Boston Retirement System, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and DeKalb County Pension Fund
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC D/B/A 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou,LLC doing business as 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory
Defendant: Aetna, Inc., Aetna Better Health of Texas Inc, Aetna Health And Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Insurance
City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System v. Pegasystems Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00578
Plaintiff: City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Retirement Income Plan 1987 and others
Defendant: Pegasystems Inc., Alan Trefler and Kenneth Stillwell
Petitioner: Boston Retirement System, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and DeKalb County Pension Fund
Arcot et al v. Sarva et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02135
Plaintiff: MD Kishore Arcot, Memphis Cardiology, PLC, Memphis Cardiology, PLC Profit Sharing Pension Plan and others
Defendant: Ramesh Sarva and Ramesh Sarva CPA, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Law Offices of Jonathan Stein,, et al v. Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, et al
as 22-55156
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN STEIN, P.C. DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, ARKA INC. PROFIT-SHARING PLAN, LINDA HONG SUN STEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee: GABRIELINO-TONGVA TRIBE, a California unincorporated association
Allison v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff: Reginald T. Allison and City of Dearborn Police & Fire Revised Retirement System
Defendant: Oak Street Health, Inc., Michael Pykosz, Timothy Cook and others
Petitioner: Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore, Employees Retirement System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
MEBA Pension Trust-Defined Benefit Plan et al v. NCL America, LLC
as 8:2022cv00006
Plaintiff: MEBA Pension Trust -Defined Benefit Plan, MEBA Medical and Benefits Plan, MEBA 401(k) Plan and others
Defendant: NCL America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dan Hale, et al v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 21-6253
Plaintiff: DAN E. HALE
Plaintiff / Appellant: DON HALE, Individually, and as Trustee for the HRC Medical Defined Benefit Plan
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel., HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General and Reporter and HOGDEN MAINDA
Russo v. Valmet, Inc., et al
as 21-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL RUSSO
Defendant / Appellee: VALMET, INC., a Delaware Corporation with a place of business in Duluth, Georgia and VALMET, INC. DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN
Law Offices of Jonathan Stein, P.C. Defined Benefit Plan et al v. Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv05653
Plaintiff: Law Offices of Jonathan Stein, P.C. Defined Benefit Plan, Arka Inc. Profit-Sharing Plan, Jonathan Stein and others
Defendant: Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?