Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Harold Hayes v. Bradley Barthuly, et al
as 26-5769
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EUGENE HAYES
Defendant:
BRADLEY BARTHULY, DELVIN NIELSEN and EMILY AGUILAR
JACKSON v. PEOPLES
as 4:2026cv01110
Petitioner:
ANTWAN JACKSON
Respondent:
DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. PEOPLES
as 5:2026cv00341
Petitioner:
ANTWAN JACKSON
Respondent:
DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. KLINGLER et al
as 4:2026cv00371
Plaintiff:
DELVIN ODESSIUS HILL
Defendant:
NICOLE KLINGLER and WALT MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. HUNT et al
as 5:2026cv00302
Plaintiff:
TODDRICK DANTAE HUNTER
Defendant:
NURSE CYNTHIA HUNT, DR YASIR MUKHTHAR, DR LUKE ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Delvin et al
as 3:2026cv01458
Plaintiff:
Paige Marie Glenn
Defendant:
Jennifer Delvin and Cassandra Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVER v. CITY OF POOLER et al
as 5:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
CITY OF POOLER, LOGANS ROADHOUSE II LLC, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MOORE v. SALES et al
as 5:2026cv00222
Plaintiff:
CORWYN BRUCE MOORE, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, DEREK MCDANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Peoples
as 1:2026cv03028
Petitioner:
Aaron Edward Strong
Respondent:
Warden Delvin Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. PEOPLES
as 3:2026cv00059
Petitioner:
RONALD FRANCIS HENRY
Respondent:
DELVIN PEOPLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
