Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Reginald Grider, Jr. v. Kimberly Anderson, et al
as 26-5987
Defendant:
DELVIN NIELSEN, Sergeant, Kentucky State Penitentiary, SHANE J. SPURLOCK, Captain, Kentucky State Penitentiary and KIMBERLY ANDERSON, Lieutenant, Kentucky State Penitentiary
Plaintiff:
REGINALD L. GRIDER, JR.
Conexus Energy Group, LLC. v. Ingrid, LLC. et al
as 1:2026cv02152
Defendant:
Dale LeFebvre, Delvin Kelly, Jay Scherer and others
Plaintiff:
Conexus Energy Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
LATIMORE v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2026cv00444
Plaintiff:
ROY LATIMORE
Defendant:
LUCIYONNA HAMILTON, DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES, TARA HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbitt v. Little et al
as 2:2026cv01814
Plaintiff:
Delvin Devonte Corbitt
Defendant:
Michael Little, Vencini Smith and John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilman v. Peoples
as 3:2026cv00220
Petitioner:
Davoric Pentez Tilman
Respondent:
Delvin Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00610
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harold Hayes v. Bradley Barthuly, et al
as 26-5769
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EUGENE HAYES
Defendant:
BRADLEY BARTHULY, DELVIN NIELSEN and EMILY AGUILAR
RHODES v. Warden Delvin Peoples
as 1:2026cv00166
Petitioner:
DAG RHODES
Respondent:
Warden Delvin Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
