Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cooper v. Phyall et al
as 5:2023cv04818
Plaintiff:
Raikwon Shaleek Jerome Cooper
Defendant:
Major Tony Phyall, Captain Boyd, Director Demry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Simmons v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv04483
Plaintiff:
Marquise Deronante Simmons
Defendant:
Sheriff Duane Lewis, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Major Tony Phyall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Demry v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Denico Demry
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Laisha G. Garcia Ramirez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al.
as 2:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Laisha Garcia Ramirez, Demri Chen and Laisha G. Garcia Ramirez
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Scott v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mahoney, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demry Hill v. C. Maiorana
as 14-31146
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEMRY HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
C. MAIORANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hill v. Maiorana
as 2:2013cv02902
Plaintiff:
Demry Hill
Defendant:
C Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
