Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TROTTER v. U.S. DEPT OF NAVY et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
LATASHA TROTTER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT OF NAVY and ADAM ALEXANDER EIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanchez et al v. U.S. Dept. of Defense (Honolulu) et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Dulce M Robles, Dingo Sanchez and Martin Santana
Defendant:
Doe Government Agencies 1-20, Charles E. Schaff, John Does 1-20 and others
Buck v. Secretary of Navy, Dept. of Navy
as 8:2018cv03289
Defendant:
Secretary of Navy, Dept. of Navy
Plaintiff:
Alan Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hadassa Investment Security Nigeria Ltd v. Swiftships Shipbuilders L L C et al
as 6:2016cv01502
Plaintiff:
Hadassa Investment Security Nigeria Ltd
Defendant:
Swiftships Shipbuilders L L C, Swiftships L L C and U S Dept of Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diana v. Mabis et al
as 6:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie (Fiore) Diana
Defendant:
Raymond Mabis, Veterans Administration, Utica State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LALOUP et al v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2013cv07124
Plaintiff:
CRAIG LALOUP and BEVERLY LALOUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES DEPT. OF NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Watson v. USA
as 2:2012cv02823
Plaintiff:
Misty Watson
Defendant:
USA and U S Dept of Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
