Cases 1 - 10 of 19,031
Hedges v. Gordon et al
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
David C. Hedges
Defendant:
Deputy Thomas Gordon, Deputy LT Brittany Sydney, LT Jamie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leet v. Cotone et al
as 6:2024cv00586
Not Yet Classified:
Government of Iberia Parish
Plaintiff:
Heath Leet
Defendant:
Tim Cotone, Deputy Kaila Chipman, Iberia Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crawford v. Hall County Sheriff Dept et al
as 8:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles Crawford
Defendant:
Hall County Sheriff Dept and Deputy Draper Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Landry v. Deputy John Doe
as 5:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Monica Landry
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
