Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lipe v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Dillan Ray Lipe
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. West et al
as 3:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joey P Kimble
Defendant:
David West and Does C/Os "Dusty", "Dillan", "Jordan" and "Arlean"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felix Tyrone Randle v. S.B.S.D. et al
as 5:2019cv01696
Defendant:
Mental Health Staff, All Mental Health Staff Not Licensed, Judge Mr. Nakata and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Tyrone Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Whittington et al
as 5:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Dee Barnett, Julian Whittington, Dillan Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leroy McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradling v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Dillan Jackson, Caleb Gurdy, Claiborne Co and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Spradling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthen v. Gibson
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dillan Worthen
Defendant:
Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahs v. Swift et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dillan C. Fahs
Defendant:
Gerald Swift, Alicia, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant Charles Rhodes et al v. Susan Pochter Stone et al
as 2:2016cv01989
Defendant:
Dillan Alvarez, Dillan Alvarez, Ann Chung and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Charles Rhodes
Holt v. Allen et al
as 1:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Holt
Defendant:
Unknown Allen and Unknown Dillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Nottingham v. Joel Finsterwald, et al
as 13-10398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM, also known as Jay Nottingham, also known as Jay Thrasher, also known as James Andrew Armstrong, also known as Jeff Andrew Montgomery, also known as Jeffrey Montgomery, also known as Jay Dillan, also known as Sterling Armstrong Harr
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL FINSTERWALD, Sheriff of Wheeler County, CARRIE GAINES, Wheeler County Jailk Administrator and WHEELER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
