Cases 41 - 50 of 611
SMITH et al v. CLAWSON et al
as 2:2022cv03165
Plaintiff:
DESHON A.R. SMITH, TERNCE DAVIS and DAVID RASIRO
Defendant:
C/O1 CLAWSON, C/O1 LAWRNCE, C/O1 J.J. BEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danielson v. Donahue
as 9:2022cv00676
Petitioner:
William Danielson
Respondent:
J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danielson v. Donahue
as 1:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
William Danielson
Respondent:
J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parrott v. Donahue
as 9:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Mark Parrott, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrott v. Donahue
as 1:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Mark Parrott, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. United State of America
as 1:2022cv10566
Petitioner:
David Donahue
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Dr. Demsey, Stephen Donahue, Shawn Kephart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figures v. Donahue et al
as 8:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Toccara Figures
Defendant:
Corey J. Donahue, Samantha Casey and Jordan P. Jeffery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Kenneth Bradshaw, Ariel Monge, Unknown Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Human Rights Defense Center et al v. Canyon County, Idaho et al
as 1:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Canyon County, Idaho, Kieran Donahue and John and Jane Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
