Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Collins v. Beasley et al
as 6:2026cv00056
Plaintiff:
C. Doug Collins
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, Lt. Rodney Foulks, Christopher Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Oliveras-Rosario v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2026cv01440
Plaintiff:
Angel L Oliveras-Rosario
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Carlos R Escobar, David B Isaacks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust v. Collins
as 1:2026cv01619
Plaintiff:
Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust
Defendant:
Doug Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Karr v. Biden Jr et al
as 2:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Karr, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden Jr, United States of America, Department of Veterans Affair and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
