Cases 31 - 40 of 30,691
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Podlesnik v. Cardona et al
as 6:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Podlesnik
Defendant:
Dr. Miguel A. Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kirksey v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie, Dr McLean, Rachel Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Boyette v. Montefiore Medical Center
as 24-1279
Plaintiff:
SHEILA A. BOYETTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and TIFFANY JIMINEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, THE TDA PLAN COMMITTEE and others
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAGAN v. BARNHISER et al
as 2:2024cv06012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. FAGAN
Defendant:
BRET T. BARNHISER, NANOLOGIX, INC., DR. JONATHAN FARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
