Cases 11 - 20 of 25
ROUSE v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv01051
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. ROUSE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yamassee Indian Tribe v. Allendale County Government
as 14-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YAMASSEE INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLENDALE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, WALTER H. SANDERS, JR., HARVEY E. ROUSE, Tax Assessor and others
ROUSE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN E. ROUSE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Janice Rouse v. Commissioner of SSA
as 13-2486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE E. ROUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Rouse v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 5:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E. Rouse
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rouse v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Rouse, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Burton Mixer, State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yamassee Indian Tribe v. Allendale County Government et al
as 1:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Yamassee Indian Tribe
Defendant:
Allendale County Government, Walter H Sanders, Jr, Harvey E Rouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rouse v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013mc00043
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Rouse, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Burton Mixer, State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole and others
Garcia v. Glendale Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv02014
Plaintiff:
Annie R Garcia
Defendant:
Glendale Police Department, R Solomon, D Reben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Turpen v. Norman Rouse
as 12-6039
Debtor:
In re: Mark Troy Turpen
Debtor - Appellant:
Mark Troy Turpen
Trustee - Appellee:
Norman E. Rouse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
