Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Slaughter v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv01023
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Slaughter
Defendant:
Columbia Mutual Insurance Company and Columbia Mutual Insurance Company doing business as Columbia Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mimnis v. GEO Corporation et al
as 9:2017cv80170
Plaintiff:
Bobby Minnis
Defendant:
GEO Corporation, Mave, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. Slaughter et al
as 3:2011cv01070
Plaintiff:
Robert P Sapp
Defendant:
Richard E Slaughter, Jr and Napoli Italian Restaurant Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burton v. Slaughter et al
as 1:2009cv06216
Plaintiff:
Augueste J. Burton
Defendant:
E. Slaughter, Sergeant Hallihan, Sergeant Dew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv02545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClellan v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv01754
Plaintiff:
Ron McClellan
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Gordienz, Dorothy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tucker
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cowart-El v. Godinez et al
as 1:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Cowart-El
Defendant:
S. Godinez and E. Slaughter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Slaughter v. Hillyer et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2007cv00366
Plaintiff:
James E. Slaughter
Defendant:
Ronald W. Hillyer, Jay Jones, Carrie Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
