Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tate v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00259
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tate
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02740
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tate
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01749
Plaintiff:
Albert Noel, Nancy Prescott, Phillip Grimes and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eddie Tate v. Tre Smith, et al
as 20-35271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE TATE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAUN HILTON, TRE SMITH and THE CITY OF SEATTLE
Eddie Tate v. Superintendent Benner Township, et al
as 19-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE TATE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Tate v. Smith et al
as 2:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tate
Defendant:
Tre Smith, Shaun Hilton, Unknown Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2017cv04577
Petitioner:
EDDIE TATE
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TATE v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2013cv04586
Plaintiff:
EDDIE TATE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. McCrary Construction Services et al
as 1:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tate
Defendant:
McCrary Construction Services , Jay McCrary and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
