Cases 1 - 10 of 27
(HC) Harris v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Ernest Harris
Respondent:
C. Pfeifer, M. Melendrez and Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Harris Business Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harris Business Industries, LLC and Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Harris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01525
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31294
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Carder et al
as 1:2019cv05618
Plaintiff:
Rex Ernest Harris
Defendant:
Fannin Co Sheriff's Office, Officer Dustin Carder and Sheriff Dane Kirby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Saffold
as 1:2018cv02062
Defendant:
Shirley S. Saffold
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Sherwin-Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams and John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ernest Harris
as 16-1750
Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Manita Dawson v Southfield Police Officer Christopher Don, et al
as 2:2015cv13269
Defendant:
Southfield Police Officer Christopher Don , Southfield Police Officer Shawn Irwin and City of Southfield
Plaintiff:
Manita Dawson, as next friend of Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Ernest Harri
as 15-2102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST HARRIS, a/k/a Pickle, a/k/a Michael Young, a/ka Michael Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
