Cases 11 - 20 of 6,420
Williams #218584 v. Otter et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Williams
Defendant:
N Otter, Unknown Valasco, Unknown Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown Bull v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05024
Plaintiff:
Evan Brown Bull
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasley v. Neumann et al
as 0:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Edward Evan Lasley
Defendant:
Neumann, Mohamed, Rice County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman Pryor v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3301
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of ODRC, In their individual and official capacity, LIEUTINENT ARIANNA BROCK, In their individual and official capacity, M. DARKANGELO, Mental Health Administrator, In their individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
