Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bradley v. Charles
as 24-3257
Defendant:
BYRON KENNEDY, M.D., SANDRA CHARLES, APRN, DOE, Defendant; 1; oncall provider; Defendant; 2; Physician of record under whose License APRN Charles worked upon information and belief Byron Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
EARL BRADLEY
Bradley v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv02678
Respondent:
Tim Hooper
Petitioner:
Earl Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breton v. Bradley
as 3:2024cv01768
Defendant:
Earl Bradley
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Perry et al
as 3:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Kasabji, Richard B. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, Doe, Byron Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Susan Duffel, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Colclough et al
as 6:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hunt Williams and April Garner
Defendant:
Terrance Colclough, Lhoman Mays, Nelson Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Earl BradleyIn re: Earl Bradley
as 21-2616
Petitioner:
In re: EARL BRADLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CHESHIRE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, STATE OF DELAWARE and LEONARD P. STARK
WHITE v. MASSEE et al
as 5:2020cv00476
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILL MASSEE, SERGEANT KITCHEN, LIEUTENANT GLENN and others
Plaintiff:
JULIUS WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Bradley v. Warden Cheshire Correctional, et al
as 20-3456
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN CHESHIRE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL BRADLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.