Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Trotter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Earl Trotter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loveland v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
David Earl Loveland, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney General, US Attorney District Court of Md. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ohlson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Ryan Earl Ohlson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EARL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
GRACE LYNN MICHELLE EARL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crownhart (PS) v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Earl Crownhart
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MEINERT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL MEINERT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Earl Willis Powell, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jenna Earl v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv08173
Plaintiff:
Jenna Earl
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hulford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05828
Plaintiff:
James Earl Hulford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
