Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Easley v. CDC - California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00668
Plaintiff:
Steven Easley
Defendant:
CDC - California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Neighborhood Crime Watch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Easley
as 5:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
Catherine Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00436
Defendant:
AIX Group, Jonathan Abadie, Jason Acree and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Benjamin, Lubin Gilbert, Sophie Kosofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kassa v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kidanemariam Kassa
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, Paul H. Howard, Antionette Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rigsby v. Easley #138 et al
as 4:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Dean Alan Rigsby
Defendant:
Easley #138 , Johnson #120 , John Doe (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch et al v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services et al
as 4:2017cv01091
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family & Protective Services , Henry Hank Whitman , Deiandra Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Z.W. Welch , Michael Welch and K.W. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Eric Ollison
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc , Marcus Hardy , Arthur Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
