Cases 1 - 10 of 1,215
FUJIFILM CORPORATION v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
FUJIFILM CORPORATION
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Planque v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Police Department, Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Rory M Planque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Edward Johnson v. Brian Smith, et al
as 24-5436
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, Individually, JOSH STALLONS, Individually and EDWARD EASTMAN, Individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(HC) Eastman v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osirio #307582 v. Dennis et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rae Osirio, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Dennis, D Dowling, Hayden Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
FUJIFILM CORPORATION v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
as 1:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
FUJIFILM CORPORATION
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hines v. Foot Locker et al
as 6:2024cv06060
Plaintiff:
Sherell Ann Hines
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Shoe Sences, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
