Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Endress+Hauser Inc.
as 4:2020cv04024
Defendant:
Endress+Hauser Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nitetek Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ENDRESS + HAUSER INC. v. MICROWAVE PRECISION INSTRUMENTS, INC.
as 1:2020cv00944
Plaintiff:
ENDRESS HAUSER INC.
Defendant:
MICROWAVE PRECISION INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
as 19-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc., an Iowa corporation and Endress + Hauser, Inc., an Indiana corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Engineered Sales, Co., a Minnesota corporation
Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
as 0:2017cv03456
Plaintiff:
Engineered Sales, Co.
Defendant:
Endress + Hauser, Inc. and Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banertek LLC v. Endress + Hauser Inc.
as 2:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Banertek LLC
Defendant:
Endress + Hauser Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Hopkins v. Endress & Hauser, Inc
as 4:2015mc08175
Plaintiff:
R Sam Hopkins
Defendant:
Endress & Hauser, Inc
INTEMPCO CONTROLS LTD. v. ENDRESS+HAUSER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
INTEMPCO CONTROLS LTD.
Defendant:
ENDRESS+HAUSER, INC., ENDRESS+HAUSER WETZER (USA), INC., ENDRESS+HAUSER GMBH+CO and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cavcon Inc. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cavcon, Inc. and Cavcon, Inc.
Defendant:
Todd Lucey, Todd Lucey, Todd Lucey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
