Cases 81 - 90 of 2,508
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Philip Pulley, et al v. Sterling Bancorp, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP C. PULLEY and DEVRA K. PULLEY, H/W
Defendant / Appellee:
STERLING BANCORP, STERLING NATIONAL BANK, TRANSUNION LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grays v. Navient Solutions, et al
as 23-1107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY GRAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., INNOVIS DATA SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
