Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Eric Hunter v. United States
as 23-3554
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric Michelle Hunter
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Eric Hunter
as 22-3474
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric Michelle Hunter
HUNTER v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
ERIC MICHELLE HUNTER
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Deborah Bygum v. The City of Montgomery
as 21-2130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEBORAH BYGUM, Administratrix of the Estate of Eric Michell Young, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY and ROGER L. KING, individually as a member of the Montgomery Police Department
Defendant:
THE MONTGOMERY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SMITHERS and JOHN MICHAEL HESS, SR., individually as a member of the Smithers Police Department
United States v. Eric Michelle Hunter
as 20-3459
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric Michelle Hunter
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Eric Michelle Hunter v. United States
as 20-2070
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eric Michelle Hunter
Bygum et al v. The City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bygum and Eric Michell Young
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery, Roger L. King and The Montgomery Policy Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. San Mateo County et al
as 3:2016cv00252
Defendant:
San Mateo County , Greg Munks, San Mateo County Sheriff , John Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl May, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Eric Michelle Hunter
as 14-3893
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Michelle Hunter
United States v. Eric Michelle Hunter
as 13-2452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Michelle Hunter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
