Cases 21 - 30 of 325
ETHRIDGE v. RAHMAN
as 3:2023cv01441
Defendant:
HAKEEM ALI RAHMAN and ERIC JEROME BOATWRIGHT
Plaintiff:
SHANNON NICOLE ETHRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobbs, II v. Cpl. Byrd, et al
as 3:2023cv03015
Plaintiff:
Michael Ransom Hobbs, II
Defendant:
Baxter County Detention Center, Jailer Joe Willbanks, Sergeant Tabitha Maze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ETHRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
JERALD SCOTT ETHRIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ethridge v. Samsung SDI
as 23-40094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Ethridge
Defendant / Appellee:
Samsung SDI Company, Limited, Amazon.com, Incorporated and Amazon.com Services, Incorporated
ETHRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23083
Plaintiff:
APRIL ETHRIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAUGH v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EUGENE BAUGH
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, HENTON, FAGOROYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ethridge v. Cross et al
as 3:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Carl Ethridge
Defendant:
Katrina Cross, N. Boatwright and S. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULCIN v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
J CHUNN, V HUGGINS, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ethridge et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv04497
Plaintiff:
Reggie Ethridge and Shadda Ethridge
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Spaulding v. West et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Whitney Spaulding
Defendant:
Matthew West, Kyle Garcia, Christopher Ethridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
