Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shannon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00684
Plaintiff:
Gibran Alexander Shannon
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Warden Fredrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Crump et al
as 4:2026cv01380
Plaintiff:
Tamond Thomas
Defendant:
Corporal Unknown Crump, Sergeant M. Tubbs, Deputy Unknown Lurk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seoane v. Trump et al
as 6:2026cv01886
Plaintiff:
Donald Carlos Seoane and Donny Long
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Keith E. Neely, Kash Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6894
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seoane v. Trump et al
as 2:2026cv01002
Plaintiff:
Donald Carlos Seoane and Donny Long
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump, Keith E Neely, Kash Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seoane v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2026cv00575
Plaintiff:
Donald Carlos Seoane
Defendant:
Governor Ron DeSantis, Casey DeSantis, Florida AG James Uthmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Shakeyra Bradley v. US Postal Service Headquarters, et al
as 26-12571
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE HEADQUARTERS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, FED EX SHIPCENTER and others
Feds for Freedom v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2026cv07545
Plaintiff:
Feds for Freedom
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Boyd v. Rockstrem et al
as 2:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
Alex Rockstrem, Jennifer Gonzolez, WCC Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
