Cases 1 - 10 of 381
Fancher v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fancher
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fancher v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
David Fancher
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Fancher et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Fancher, Lee Futrell, John Orue and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fancher et al v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Fancher, Lee Futrell, John Orue and others
Defendant:
United States of America
DiDonna v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv06107
Plaintiff:
Louis Andrew DiDonna
Defendant:
Harold L. Smith, Sullivan County Jail, Sullivan County Jail Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo Anne Saucier, et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 22-1460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jo Anne Saucier, Cheryle Hanzel, Julie Johnson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Doe Manufacturers, 1-100
Dempsey v. More et al
as 2:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Defendant:
Leslie More, More, Debbie Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fancher v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv03007
Plaintiff:
Rickie Fancher
Defendant:
J B Pritzker and Brendon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fancher v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2021cv00235
Petitioner:
Charles Alan Fancher
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
