Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
as 24-2355
Plaintiff:
PAYSERVICES BANK
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
Comerica Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
as 2:2024cv10963
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Federal Reserve Bank
as 1:2024cv10280
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Muhammad v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Nicholas Becka and Sushmita Shukla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Joel Horta Suarez
as 24-10211
Petitioner:
In re: JOEL ALBERTO HORTA SUAREZ
Respondent:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, SANTANDER BANK and others
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Catholic Health Assoication Santa Ana, CA et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Catholic Health Assoication of the United States of America, Santa Ana, CA, Joel Osteen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GROSSWALD v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROSSWALD
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
