Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Folks v. Coastal State Prison
as 4:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Folks
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Folke v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 26-5813
Petitioner:
DUANE RODNEY FOLKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL, GEORGE S. CARDONA and others
Folk v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv06193
Plaintiff:
Melissa Folk
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Contreas et al
as 6:2026cv01258
Plaintiff:
Lakisha M. Anderson
Defendant:
Jose Contreas, Steven Folk, James Scarmbelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khatod v. Folks et al
as 3:2026cv03379
Defendant:
William R. Folks, III, Will and FITSNews, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lorie Khatod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Toole v. Woodard et al
as 2:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
Brett Woodard, General Norfolk Building Inspection and GMG Taylor and Ms. Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lim v. Evers et al
as 1:2026cv05961
Plaintiff:
Khor C. Lim
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Jason Sanders, Urbik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Folks v. Chambers et al
as 1:2026cv01289
Plaintiff:
Marcus Folks
Defendant:
. Chambers, William Yoder, Chikahisa Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
