Cases 1 - 10 of 2,740
Arcello v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Francis Arcello
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Arcello v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Francis Michael Arcello
Defendant:
Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jiang v. Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd et al
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd, Dollar Tree Store 132-23 14th Avenue and Li Dongsheng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manno v. McRae et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dr. Francis A.M. Manno
Defendant:
Dr. Susan McRae, Karen Oppelt, Members of the IACUC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
