Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carter et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter, Brian Cosby, Ernest Snipes and others
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Refuse Division and Timothy Banta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Green v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00904
Plaintiff:
Frederick Green
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
GREEN v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv14671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GREEN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION,
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jonathan Frederick Green v. Nancy A Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00046
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Green
Green v. Wood et al
as 1:2016cv01497
Plaintiff:
Frederick Green
Defendant:
B. Wood, J. Fino and Mr. Ragsdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hossu v. County Of Putnam et al
as 7:2016cv02027
Plaintiff:
Alexandru Hossu
Defendant:
County Of Putnam , Donald Smith , William McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Greene et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01568
Defendant:
Does, Wright Medical Group Inc and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Greene and Frederick Greene
US v. Frederick Green
as 12-4137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK GREEN
White et al v. Hanke et al
as 3:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee White, Allen Halling, James Wright and others
Defendant:
David Hanke, Robert Larkin, Pete Sferrazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
