Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Anderson v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
David G Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Carson
as 1:2020cv02365
Defendant:
DJ Carson
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Zulveta v. The Barrett Law Firm
as 20-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
THE BARRETT LAW FIRM, Dan Barrett, BRENT'S LAWN CARE, LARMORE LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE HAYNSWORTH PERRY AMERICAN INNS OF COURT, JAMES BEN ALEXANDER, HENRY M. HERLON, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Northeast Natural Energy LLC v. Larson Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00748
Defendant:
Kristi A. Rydberg, Valerie French, Marjorie Dahlgren and others
Plaintiff:
Northeast Natural Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
DESPAIGNE ZULVETA v. THE BARRETT FIRM, ET AL.
as 1:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO DESPASAIGNE ZULVETA and ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Defendant:
THE BARRETT FIRM, ERIK K. ENGLEBARDT, CLAWSON AND STAUBES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anderson v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 2:2018cv00631
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Lt. Gottirup and Sgt. Pryer
Plaintiff:
Ronnie G. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29244
Plaintiff:
Bonnie G. Anderson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent Hovind v. William Anderson
as 14-7584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT E. HOVIND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM G. ANDERSON, JOHN DOE, MR. DIAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
