Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Kim v.Grand Valley State University et al
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
GwanJun Kim
Defendant:
Grand Valley State University , Thomas J. Haas , Grand Valley State University, College of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garfield Grant v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72106
Petitioner:
GARFIELD GEORGE GRANT
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Grant v. Terrell
as 1:2010cv02769
Petitioner:
Dorrell George Grant
Respondent:
Warden Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grant et al v. Askanase
as 4:2009cv03964
Plaintiff:
George Grant and Grant Family Trust
Defendant:
David Askanase
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
George Grant, Jr. v. David Crenshaw
as 09-7748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE GRANT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CRENSHAW, JOEY PRESTON and CHRISSY T. ADAMS
Grant et al v. The Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2009wf17036
Plaintiff:
George Grant, George Grant, George Grant and others
Defendant:
The Lincoln Electric Company, A. O. Smith Corporation, Arcos Alloys and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Grant et al v. The Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 5:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
George Grant, George Grant, George Grant and others
Defendant:
The Lincoln Electric Company, A. O. Smith Corporation, Arcos Alloys and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Grant v. Holt
as 4:2008cv00279
Respondent:
Ronnie R. Holt
Petitioner:
George Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02954
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Moore v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lavon Moore
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Ports Authority, California Cartage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
