Cases 11 - 20 of 285
Graham v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Charles Graham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham Parman v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-35557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM PARMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Christopher Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Cathleen A Shine and Brandi Lyn Graham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lynn Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Johanna Randahl Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Graham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jamie Graham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Graham-Babcock v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Cari A. Graham-Babcock
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv08086
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
