Cases 11 - 20 of 2,038
Rawlings v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
Richard Rawlings
Defendant:
Greene Tweed & Co., Inc., American Optical Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00825
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant:
AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff:
Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant:
John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Farris v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Brenntag Specialties LLC, DCO LLC, ITT, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Burnham LLC, Empire Comfort Systems, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, GG of Florida, Inc., Goulds Pumps (N.Y.) Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goulds Pumps LLC, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Lennox International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Fisher v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv04051
Defendant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation, Honeywell International Inc, Morese-Tec LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Glen L Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Matey v. Crane Co., et al
as 8:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Irma Matey and Richard D. Matey
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Lejeune v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lejeune
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC ind and as successor-in-interest to Milchem Incorporated, DAP, Inc., Gardner Denver, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Personal Injury Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
