Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Humphrey v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv02316
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Humphrey
Defendant:
James Davis, E. Harris, P. Bettencourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Besta et al
as 1:2026cv00168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rutledge
Defendant:
Abiy Besta, Ken Skodacek, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H. Gurvey, et alIn re: H. Gurvey, et al
as 26-2031
Petitioner:
In re: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Respondent:
M&T BANK INC, a NY Banking Corporation, SCHILLER KNAPP LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL LLP, HONORABLE GLENN GRANT and others
Rutledge v. FBI et al
as 5:2026ct03117
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rutledge
Defendant:
FBI, CIA, Defense Advance Research Project Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrity v. Cardinal Glass Industries Inc
as 3:2026cv05309
Plaintiff:
Amanda Garrity
Defendant:
Cardinal Glass Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv15064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hare v. Does 1 to 100 + et al
as 1:2025cv25793
Plaintiff:
Jaspal Singh Hare
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100 + et al, Tavinder Hare, Bonat Chea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
OLSON v. LAW OFFICES OF PAUL GARRITY et al
as 1:2025cv04231
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY OLSON
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL GARRITY and PAUL J. GARRITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc v. Dodd et al
as 4:2025cv01245
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc
Defendant:
Kimberly Dodd, Tim Griffin, Will Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
