Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lewis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16229
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, D Prothro, C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
France v. Prisoner Transport Services of America LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01733
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis France
Defendant:
Prisoner Transport Services of America LLC, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. City of Appleton et al
as 2:2014cv01298
Plaintiff:
Steven D Pillow
Defendant:
City of Appleton, Gary Lewis and Casey Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. City of Appleton et al
as 2:2014cv00953
Plaintiff:
Steven D Pillow
Defendant:
City of Appleton, Casey Voss and Gary Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2014cv01559
Defendant:
Ronal W Serpas, Darryl Albert, Otha L. Sandifer and others
Plaintiff:
Tredell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nwachuku, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 09-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER C. NWACHUKU and JOEATTA K. SMITH-NWACHUKU
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WALSH, JOHN KELLY, SEAN JOYCE and others
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, EDDY CHRISPIN, JOHN M. BUCKLEY and others
Raheem Muhammad v. Rosemary Williamson-Crawl
as 09-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSEMARY WILLIAMSON-CRAWL, ANGELA BONSU, MICHELLE REED and others
Muhammad v. Williamson-Crawl et al
as 8:2008cv02971
Plaintiff:
Raheem Muhammad
Defendant:
Rosemary Williamson-Crawl, Angela Bonsu, Michelle Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
