Cases 1 - 10 of 11
M. et al v. Crum et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah M., Hannah M., Hunter M. and others
Defendant:
Adam Crum, Kim Guay, Alaska Deparment of Health and Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norcross et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10884
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
William P. Norcross, IV and Gayle T. Norcross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Smith v. Parauda et al
as 1:2018cv02931
Plaintiff:
Avis J. Smith
Defendant:
Martina A. Parauda and Gayle T. Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Better-Primrose v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv03395
Plaintiff:
Gayle T. Better-Primrose
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Residential Credit Solutions , First Choice Funding/American Funding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Payton v. Macy's Inc.
as 4:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
Gayl T Payton
Defendant:
Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payton v. Nantucket Landing et al
as 4:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gayl T Payton
Defendant:
Nantucket Landing and Richmark Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Payton v. Macy's Inc., et al
as 4:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gayl T Payton
Defendant:
Macy's Inc. and Phillips & Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gayle T. Persons v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv00983
Defendant:
Barbara Collier, County of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff:
Gayle T Persons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
