Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jones v. McDonough et al
as 8:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Terris R. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, George M. Morris, Jennifer White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Stokes v. Dovey et al
as 1:2019cv01119
Defendant:
Lt. Simmons, Richard Dovey and George J. Morris
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stokes
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
as 1:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOEY MORRIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Tow v. T. Bulmahn, et al
as 17-30077
Appellant:
RODNEY TOW
Appellee:
T. PAUL BULMAHN, LELAND TATE, ALBERT L. REESE, JR. and others
Stephen Masapollo, et al v. Richard Hunt, et al
as 16-3937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MASAPOLLO, JEAN CORDASCO, indivud. & as H/W and SOLARWORKS NJ LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HUNT, Esq., dba PARKER MCCAY, P.C., GEORGE M. MORRIS, dba PARKER MCCAY, P.C., PARKER MCCAY and others
George Morris v. USA
as 15-15425
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE HOEY MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Bush v. Arch Coal, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
Elmer Bush
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc., John W. Eaves, Paul A. Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
