Cases 31 - 40 of 291
Donald Sherrill et al v. George Edward Boston et al
as 8:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherrill, Anthony DiPiero and Hunt and Henriques
Defendant:
George Edward Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Purdy v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2021cv00591
Plaintiff:
George Edward Purdy
Defendant:
Aaron J Tompkins, Bobby Lumpkin, FNU Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frosch v. Cowan et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
George Edward Harry Frosch
Defendant:
Jeff Cowan, FNU LNU 1:21cv-211-1 and FNU LNU 1:21-CV-211-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ingram
as 21-51120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
George Edward Ingram, Jr.
Adams v. Barton et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
George Edward Adams, III
Defendant:
Barton, Kelly, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purdy v. Lumpkin
as 21-11090
Petitioner / Appellant:
George Edward Purdy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Monroe, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04073
Plaintiff:
George Edward Monroe, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yost v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02177
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Edward Yost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
