Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burt v. DoubleDown Interactive, LLC
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gina V Burt
Defendant:
DoubleDown Interactive, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Burt v. Playtika, Ltd., et. al.
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
GINA V BURT
Defendant:
PLAYTIKA, LTD, PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP. and Playtika, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Markus McCormick v. Sasha Graham
as 23-6231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SASHA GRAHAM, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Dunlap-Banks v. City of Fayetteville, et al
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Ja'Lana Dunlap-Banks
Defendant:
Fayetteville City Police Department, City of Fayetteville, Gina V. Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PCM Sales, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv00795
Defendant:
Gina V. Johnson and Kathleen Phipps
Plaintiff:
PCM Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Napoleon L. Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricardo Ruiz, Wright, Jane Ventrella and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
