Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Terry LaCroix v. Gregory Cook, et al
as 23-1766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY LACROIX
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY COOK, Correctional Officer and KEVIN SHAIA, Correctional Officer
Cook #962653 v. Dunham et al
as 2:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cook #962653
Defendant:
Unknown Dunham, Unknown Kienitz, Sarah Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Post v. Neal et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Anthony Neal, Ron Neal, Gregory Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Post
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Post v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Anthony Neal, Ron Neal, Gregory Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Earl Post
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. HOPKINS et al
as 7:2018cv00138
Defendant:
CATHERINE SMITH, Officer SNEADS and CHARLES HOPKINS
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GREGORY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01616
Petitioner:
Gregory Cook
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Micah Spence v. Billy Love, et al
as 16-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Micah A. Spence
Defendant - Appellee:
Billy Love, RN, UAMS, Danny Campbell, Medical Staff, UAMS PRI, William Giggleman, Medical Staff, UAMS and others
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Cook v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12682
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cook
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Cook v. David Blumberg
as 13-6943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM GREGORY COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman of Maryland Parole Commission, NWACHUKWA, Parole Agent and SABASTINE NWAGBARA, Parole Agent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
