Cases 21 - 30 of 177
United States of America v. Applins (Robinson)
as 22-1686
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, AKA The Mole and others
Defendant / Appellant:
William Robinson, AKA Gugu, AKA Googs, AKA Google
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory Thomas v. Danny Samuel
as 2:2022cv03852
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas
Respondent:
Danny Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OPIE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS OPIE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. USA
as 2:2021cv00176
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58763
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. McKissic-Brown et al
as 1:2021cv04914
Plaintiff:
PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRITTANY MCKISSIC-BROWN, ROBYNNE COOPER, AVERY EASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sealed Defendant # 1 v. USA
as 5:2021cv00964
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, PATRICIA THOMPSON, D. VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hendrix v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01586
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
