Cases 1 - 10 of 12,763
Thielman, et al. v. Kotek, et al.
as 24-3857
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE GALE FJORDBECK, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
MARC THIELMAN, Senator DENNIS LINTHICUM, Senator KIM THATCHER and others
Defendant:
TINA KOTEK, in her official and personal capacities as Governor of Oregon, LAVONNE GRIFFIN-VALADE, in her official and personal capacities as Oregon Secretary of State and MOLLY WOON, in her official and personal capacities as Elections Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffin v. Daniels
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Jewel Griffin
Defendant:
Sharona Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
as 1:2024cv02726
Petitioner:
Nikita J. Griffin
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Meyers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. USA
as 3:2024cv01530
Petitioner:
Kenric Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Griffin v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03281
Plaintiff:
Arnold Griffin
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Stukey et al
as 4:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Stukey, Huff, WellPath Medical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Titus
as 9:2024cv00783
Petitioner:
Rudolph W. Griffin
Respondent:
A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
